Donald Trump announced a plan to give most Americans a $2,000 dividend funded entirely by tariff revenue, calling the U.S. tariff system so successful that it produces “Trillions of Dollars,” a “Record Stock Market Price,” and “Almost No Inflation.” He said this money could both fund the dividend and help reduce the national debt, which he noted is above $37 trillion. However, his Truth Social post did not explain who would qualify, how payments would be delivered, or when checks would arrive.

Economists quickly questioned the math. Trump did not clarify what counts as “high income,” making it hard to estimate the cost. Erica York calculated that if the payment covered adults earning under $100,000, the plan would cost around $300 billion, while other estimates reached $513 billion. This far exceeds the $90 billion in net tariff revenue collected so far. Analysts also pointed out that tariffs usually raise consumer prices, contradicting his claim of “almost no inflation,” and that the proposal relies on future revenue that may never materialize.

Legal challenges add more uncertainty. The tariffs were imposed under emergency powers, and three federal courts have already ruled this approach unconstitutional. The Supreme Court will decide the issue, meaning the tariff system Trump depends on could be struck down entirely.

Trump later offered only a vague timeline, saying the dividend would come next year, while Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent admitted, “We will see. We need legislation for that.” With no detailed plan, funding model, or congressional path forward, critics say the proposal resembles political messaging more than policy.

Still, the promise stands out because a $2,000 payment is direct and memorable. Supporters may view it as immediate relief, while critics call it unrealistic. Its impact may lie less in feasibility and more in shaping expectations about bold economic promises in American politics.