Zohran Mamdani’s potential swearing-in as New York’s 111th mayor faces uncertainty after a shocking new detail comes to light, prompting questions about eligibility, political ramifications, and procedural hurdles, leaving constituents and observers speculating on how this revelation could reshape the city’s leadership landscape and the future of its mayoral office.

Zohran Mamdani, 34, just won the New York City mayor’s race in November 2025. It’s a big deal for a lot of reasons.

When he takes office on January 1, 2026, he’ll be the city’s first Muslim mayor, the first of South Asian descent, and the first born in Africa. That’s three historic firsts in one go.

He ran on the stuff that actually keeps people up at night: rent being insane, housing shortages, crappy public transit, and the gap between rich and poor getting wider.

It clicked with a lot of voters, especially younger ones and longtime residents who are tired of the same old promises.
But right as everyone’s celebrating this milestone, a weird little history nerd fight popped up. Turns out the city might have been counting its mayors wrong for the last couple hundred years.

Some historian named Paul Hortenstine dug into old colonial records and found that a guy called Matthias Nicolls served two separate terms back in the 1670s (1672-73 and then again 1674-75). Official lists today only count him once. If you add that missing term back in, every mayor since then is off by one number.
That would make Mamdani the 112th mayor instead of the 111th.

The city’s official books, the Green Book, websites, everything still says 111th. City Hall knows about the research but hasn’t done anything about it yet. They’ve fixed this kind of thing before (back in 1937 they added a forgotten mayor to the list), but there’s no rush this time.
Realistically, it changes nothing about Mamdani’s job or power. He won fair and square. It’s just a question of whether the plaque on his desk and the history books should say 111 or 112.

Some people want the record fixed for accuracy. Others say it’s not worth the hassle and confusion. Either way, when he gets sworn in next month, he’ll probably just be called “Mayor Mamdani” and get to work.

The numbering thing will stay a fun footnote for history buffs, and maybe one day the city will quietly update the list. Or maybe not. Doesn’t really matter to the millions of New Yorkers who just voted for change.

Related Posts

Woman Sh0t and K!lled by ICE Agent in Minneapolis Identified — What We Know So Far

Renee Nicole Good, 37, was killed on January 7, 2026, during a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement operation in south Minneapolis, leaving a family and community in…

Richard “Dick” Carlson, father of Tucker Carlson, lived a life marked by resilience,

Richard Warner Carlson, known as Dick Carlson, was born on February 10, 1941, in Boston, Massachusetts. His biological parents were very young—his mother was 15, his father…

The Child We Welcomed Into Our Home Grew Up—Then One Day, He Met Someone From His Past

A career caring for children teaches resilience, but nothing prepared me for the little boy I met decades ago—a child with a failing heart and a quiet…

She claimed exhaustion, so i gave my bed to my mother-in-law on my wedding night.

On my wedding night, I believed sacrifice was love. “That this was temporary. That marriage required compromise,” I told myself as I gave Loretta my bed without…

Why Vertical Lines on Your Nails Often Appear With Age

Noticing thin vertical lines running from the base of your fingernails to the tips can be surprising, especially as they become more visible with age. Many people…

“Fans React to Shania Twain, 59, Wearing What Some Called a ‘Diaper’ During Her Recent Performance

Shania Twain, long celebrated as the “Queen of Country Pop,” continues to captivate audiences at 59 with bold style and fearless performance. During her Las Vegas residency,…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *