Minnesota protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement have drawn increased scrutiny as they become more frequent, organized, and confrontational. What appear to be spontaneous demonstrations are now viewed by critics as coordinated actions linked to national political networks. Indivisible Twin Cities, an affiliate of the Indivisible Project, presents itself as a “grassroots volunteer movement,” yet its ability to mobilize large crowds around ICE operations has raised questions about professional organizing and outside support.

Protests escalated after the fatal shooting of Renee Nicole Good during an ICE operation. Law enforcement said Good attempted to strike an agent with her vehicle, while activists rejected that account and described her as a “peaceful legal observer.” Organizers framed her death as emblematic of “systemic abuse and unchecked power,” turning the incident into a rallying symbol against immigration enforcement and deepening public polarization.

Financial disclosures further complicated claims of purely local activism. The Washington, D.C.–based Indivisible Project received about $7.85 million from George Soros’ Open Society Foundations between 2018 and 2023 and openly describes itself as a “coordinated national movement” opposing conservative governance. Critics argue this funding structure challenges the image of organic, community-driven protests.

Similar tactics and messaging have appeared in other national movements, including anti-Trump “No Kings” rallies. Indivisible affiliates often maintain opaque leadership structures, which supporters say protect volunteers, while critics say they shield professional activists from scrutiny.

In Minnesota, figures such as CAIR-Minnesota director Jaylani Hussein, who described ICE as an “occupying force,” along with Nekima Levy Armstrong and Edwin Torres DeSantiago, helped sustain protests and link Good’s death to a broader national struggle over immigration and power.