The House Oversight Committee voted to advance contempt of Congress resolutions against Bill and Hillary Clinton after both refused to comply with subpoenas tied to an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. The move marks an unusual escalation, as it targets both a former president and a former secretary of state. Supporters say it reinforces Congress’s oversight authority, while critics argue it is politically driven and risks deepening partisan conflict.
The subpoenas, issued July 23, 2025, sought sworn testimony about the Clintons’ past associations with Epstein. Republicans argue the inquiry is needed to determine whether powerful figures or federal agencies failed to act. Epstein’s network has long raised questions about accountability and influence, making, in their view, testimony from prominent individuals essential.
The Clintons declined to appear, calling the subpoenas “invalid” and “politically motivated.” In a joint statement, they accused Republicans of “weaponizing Congress for political gain” and warned the process was “literally designed to result in our imprisonment.” Their attorneys argued the committee lacked a clear legislative purpose and that the effort amounted to harassment.
Despite objections, the committee approved the resolutions in bipartisan votes. Chair James Comer said subpoenas are not optional and that no one can decide unilaterally which to obey. If approved by the full House, the citations could be referred for prosecution, though experts note such cases are rare. Even so, the episode highlights growing tensions over congressional power, accountability, and whether aggressive oversight strengthens democracy or fuels division.
