Zohran Mamdani’s potential swearing-in as New York’s 111th mayor faces uncertainty after a shocking new detail comes to light, prompting questions about eligibility, political ramifications, and procedural hurdles, leaving constituents and observers speculating on how this revelation could reshape the city’s leadership landscape and the future of its mayoral office.

Zohran Mamdani, 34, just won the New York City mayor’s race in November 2025. It’s a big deal for a lot of reasons.

When he takes office on January 1, 2026, he’ll be the city’s first Muslim mayor, the first of South Asian descent, and the first born in Africa. That’s three historic firsts in one go.

He ran on the stuff that actually keeps people up at night: rent being insane, housing shortages, crappy public transit, and the gap between rich and poor getting wider.

It clicked with a lot of voters, especially younger ones and longtime residents who are tired of the same old promises.
But right as everyone’s celebrating this milestone, a weird little history nerd fight popped up. Turns out the city might have been counting its mayors wrong for the last couple hundred years.

Some historian named Paul Hortenstine dug into old colonial records and found that a guy called Matthias Nicolls served two separate terms back in the 1670s (1672-73 and then again 1674-75). Official lists today only count him once. If you add that missing term back in, every mayor since then is off by one number.
That would make Mamdani the 112th mayor instead of the 111th.

The city’s official books, the Green Book, websites, everything still says 111th. City Hall knows about the research but hasn’t done anything about it yet. They’ve fixed this kind of thing before (back in 1937 they added a forgotten mayor to the list), but there’s no rush this time.
Realistically, it changes nothing about Mamdani’s job or power. He won fair and square. It’s just a question of whether the plaque on his desk and the history books should say 111 or 112.

Some people want the record fixed for accuracy. Others say it’s not worth the hassle and confusion. Either way, when he gets sworn in next month, he’ll probably just be called “Mayor Mamdani” and get to work.

The numbering thing will stay a fun footnote for history buffs, and maybe one day the city will quietly update the list. Or maybe not. Doesn’t really matter to the millions of New Yorkers who just voted for change.

Related Posts

If you meet this single requirement, you qualify for Trump’s $2,000 tariff dividends

President Donald Trump has been teasing the idea of giving Americans a $2,000 “tariff dividend,” a phrase that has generated excitement, skepticism, and plenty of questions. Chief…

Update on Bondi hero who confronted gunman as lawyer raises question about his injuries

Ahmed Al-Ahmed, the man whose bravery at Bondi Beach helped stop a massacre, is now recovering in a hospital bed — pale, wounded, and fighting through pain…

The FDA has issued an urgent nationwide recall

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has announced a voluntary recall of certain batches of Chantix (varenicline), a widely prescribed medication that has helped millions of adults…

At 18, Barron Trump FINALLY Admits What We All Suspected…

Raised in Manhattan’s rarefied world, Barron Trump’s life could have easily become a cliché of entitlement. Instead, Melania Trump reportedly focused on grounding him, prioritizing humility, languages,…

Consequences of kissing a deceased person: what you should know

Losing a loved one can trigger deep emotional responses, including the desire to give a final kiss as a goodbye. While this gesture may feel comforting in…

Joe Biden with tears in his eyes make the sad announcement.

He sat behind the Resolute Desk, the same place he had announced hope and recovery, now forced to confront his own limits before the world. Biden’s withdrawal…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *